Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rebecca Abercrombie's avatar

You know…I concluded a while back that Ro Khanna was a case of “no there there”, where his supposed reputation as a progressive was really a case of a cagey and careful politician who talked some of the talk, but that was about it…. It’s still all about “civility”, reaching across the aisle, and—oh yeah—making some changes in the irredeemable Democratic Party. This party has mostly become a collection of capitalists focused on projecting—in this case categorizing the Republicans as the only fascists when, in fact, the Democrats have been colluding to maintain and expand much the same basic villainy for many decades….

My other comment is that there was no mention of a huge problem for Harris—Gaza…and her utter failure to react to the public’s revulsion of US involvement in the ongoing genocide. Or the US imperialism pushing us into more and more conflicts and ever closer to a nuclear event, all the while whining about the expenditures—nominal by comparison to our military industrial complex’s budget—on the deep and deepening emergency that our society is and has been experiencing.

Also, her embrace of other war criminals—like Cheney and his daughter—was not a good look for her, although it gave substance to the burgeoning realization by that same public that she was now saying the quiet part out loud…and this is what the Democratic Party really stands for—authoritarianism…not inclusivity.

Jill Stein was the only candidate to call—unequivocally—for the actual policies the voters really want, and there was no mention of that, or the fact that the Democratic leadership went every possible route to keep the voters from exposure to her candidacy and message, or that of Claudia de la Cruz—because that would exhibit small “d” democracy in action….

Expand full comment
AnonSnark's avatar

anybody who does not reject rahm emanuel out of hand is dead to me.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts